by Melanie Freeze, Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science
The Carleton College student observations of the Iowa 2020 caucuses was a success and so much fun. We took field notes and conducted an online exit poll to analyze caucus conversations. It was interesting to observe the response to the new rules– There was a substantial amount of confusion and uncertainty about the presidential preference cards (“the DNC is the enemy” – Bernie Supporter talking about the cards thinking it was just a way for the party to find out who voted for who).
The realignment process was also fascinating–while there were some attempts to persuade, most people just quietly moved to their second choice: Warren supporter who realigned to Amy: “I’m going to move to the feisty women supporters.” The room structure played a big role in the amount of movement and deliberation that occurred: in one small precinct room that filled with chairs, conversation was more active where the group edges met.
A couple of caucuses preference groups were equal and had to flip a coin/draw straws for the delegate. Other notes and quotes: As Warren, Yang, and Gabbards are declared ‘not viable’ the viable groups begin waving their signs enticingly–notably a member from the Sanders group.; “this is how democracy starts”; “We are a big happy progressive family” – Bernie supporter; “Hey, Yang has some moderate positions like Amy”–Amy supporter; “Warren group leader to Amy group leader “Anyone bring a hot dish?”
